From Methodist to Anglican: Returning to the Church of the Wesleys

In 2022, I left my spiritual home of over 23 years. God was calling me from the United Methodist Church to the Anglican Church, and I am just now beginning to put this spiritual journey into words. 

I realized that the United Methodist Church denomination that had nurtured me for so long was shifting. However, looking back, it wasn’t so much the United Methodist denomination as it was the historic faith of the Wesleys that had nurtured my faith journey. 

Sponsored

John and Charles Wesley began Methodism at Oxford as a way to live out their Anglican faith in Christ. Thus, the very priorities of the Wesleys, which first drew me into Methodism, are now leading me to the Anglican Church.

The First Priority: A Living and Practiced Faith

Over the past 20 years, I have served as a minister in The United Methodist Church. What brought me to the Methodist Church was its intentional focus on growing as a disciple in Scriptural holiness. In John Wesley’s understanding, Methodism is a formation process by which a new believer can understand the faith, unite with the faith, and then continue to grow in holiness. A great description of a “Methodist” is found in Wesley’s short pamphlet “A Short History of Methodism.” Wesley writes that a Methodist believes in three things:

  1. “That men are all by nature dead in sin, and consequently Children of Wrath.”
  2. “That they are justified by Faith alone.”
  3. “That Faith produces an outward and an inward holiness.”

Wesley originally envisioned Methodism not as a denomination but as a systematic approach to faithful living. Wesley’s big idea was that, through practicing the “ordinances of God,” we may grow in sanctification. We approach Christianity as a way of life that must be continually practiced in the community with one another. John Wesley writes that the original Methodists were zealously attached to the Church of England. Their differences weren’t denominational but practical. 

One of the primary contributions of John Wesley to the church was the class meeting and accountability where faithful followers of Jesus could live out these three things in an intentional community of repentance and forgiveness. In this way, we grow as disciples. Methodism gave a voice to my struggles as a Christian. I found a home proclaiming the gospel of Scriptural holiness and encouraging those around me to engage in this systematic approach to following Jesus. I became a Methodist pastor to spread Scriptural holiness across the land. 

Wesley established his Methodism as a way to practice the faith of the Church of England. In his Journal entry on September 13, 1739, John Wesley wrote, “A serious clergyman desired to know, in what points we differ from the Church of England? I answered, ‘To the best of my knowledge, in none: the doctrines we preach, are the doctrines of the Church of England: indeed, the fundamental doctrines of the church, clearly laid down, both in her prayers, articles, and homilies.” Methodism took the Book of Common Prayer and put it into practice with accountability to one another. 

Coming from a background in the Christian faith that seemed uninterested in how the faith was lived out, Wesley’s priority of a living and “vital religion” made sense to me. I needed the experience of this practice in my life. It gave me hope when I struggled and support when I failed. 

The Second Priority: A Missional Faith

As a member of the United Methodist clergy, I moved around quite a bit. The United Methodist Church system calls this form of ministry itineracy. The church deploys clergy to various places around the area. In this system, I served six different churches over 18 years. In some places, the ministry was thriving, but in others, the ministry was struggling. However, this was not Wesley’s intention with his clergy. The intention was to ensure that clergy would go where the people were. The gospel was meant to be shared with everyone. The rise of the modern missional movement began, in part, with Wesley, who went out to the people. One of the questions Wesley asked his clergy was, “Will you visit from house to house?” In other words, will you be intentional about spreading Scriptural holiness with your neighbor? 

The faith that Wesley envisioned was both global (he said, “The world is my parish.”) and intentionally local (“visit house to house”). The missional church envisioned by John Wesley went beyond its walls and into the community to live the faith alongside our neighbors. Wesley writes, “They (preachers) should endeavor to live according to what they preach, to be plain, Bible-Christians. And they meet together at convenient times, to encourage one another therein.” Wesley wanted a plain faith that reached outward in a missional way. Methodism started as a missional movement within the Anglican Way. 

It seems the goal of so many churches today is to bring people into the church. However, the missional church proposed by Wesley was a movement to bring the church to the people. It took serving many different churches in many different places for me to finally realize Wesley’s priority of a missional faith. I need to be planted as a neighbor to live according to what I preach. 

The Third Priority: A Liturgical Faith

I have been in the church for as long as I can remember. My earliest memories were memories of the church. My grandfather was a pastor. The community of believers gathered together for worship nurtured my spirit. However, looking back, I find it difficult to remember a single sermon I heard in my lifetime. Sure, there were a few standouts where I could remember a phrase, sentence, and tone. What I can recall in vivid detail is the first time I heard the church’s liturgy. I remember the words offered by the minister after we have confessed our sins:

Almighty God, our heavenly Father,
who of thy great mercy hast promised forgiveness of sins
to all them that with hearty repentance and true faith turn to thee:
Have mercy upon us;
pardon and deliver us from all our sins;
confirm and strengthen us in all goodness;
and bring us to everlasting life;
through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

It was like a cup of cold water for a dry and thirsty soul. The centrality of the liturgy in worship has been part of my faith journey ever since this moment: reading scripture together, reciting the creeds together, praying for one another together, confessing our sins together, exchanging peace with one another, and gathering around the common table and sharing in the common cup. This is the fullest expression of the church. It expresses our allegiance and dependence on the one true King of Kings and Lord of Lords. This liturgical worship ultimately transforms our life into a cruciform shape.

John Wesley wrote these words on September 9, 1784, in his preface to The Sunday Service of the Methodist in North America,

I believe there is no liturgy in the World, either in ancient or modern language, which breathes more of a solid, scriptural, rational Piety, than the COMMON PRAYER of the CHURCH of ENGLAND.

Wesley turned to the Book of Common Prayer time and time again in his life in Daily Prayer. It shaped his formation and his ministry. 

Returning to the Church of the Wesleys

I found that as my ministry matured, my desire to be a part of the church of John and Charles Wesley also grew. In my daily prayer and discernment, I realized that my faith journey wasn’t abandoning The United Methodist Church, where my ministry developed, but returning to the historic church that gave birth to the Methodist missional movement. Wesley wrote of the earliest Methodists, “They were all zealous Members of the Church of England, not only tenacious in her Doctrines, as far as they knew them, but of all her Discipline, to the minutest Circumstance.” 

The church’s liturgy is the work of the people practicing their faith with the saints and the community. John Wesley knew how important it was to shape our identity, so he recommended it for his churches in America. I found the same language to express my faith through the church’s liturgy used by John and Charles Wesley. This is why moving from Methodism to Anglicanism is like returning home. I will always be a Methodist the way John Wesley was a Methodist. However, now I will practice that method while living missionally and sharing liturgically with my brothers and sisters in the Anglican Church. 

Author

Stephen Fife

Stephen Fife is a pastor and licensed professional counselor from Columbia, Louisiana. He has spent the last twenty years serving churches across the state. Stephen has been married to Marny for over 25 years, and they have three daughters.

View more from Stephen Fife

Comments

Please comment with both clarity and charity!

Subscribe to Comments
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I, too, am a former Methodist minister with one important difference—I am a woman. At age 80, I am not looking for a job and I do not object to the men only rule for clergy, but I would like the bishops to think how they could use the gifts of any woman who joins them. To shorten this, what about the women?

Very informational! I wondered how the two denominations were connected.

I think you’ve described very well the connection between Methodism and the Church of England. I often point out that Methodism was never intended to exist outside of the rhythms and cadence of the liturgical church. Or to be more blunt – and irreverent – Methodism is what happens when the youth group takes over the Church.

We are to be eternally thankful for those like the Wesley’s who turned to God and continually worked toweards Holiness. They lighten our way and give us clear direction today when our mother churches are veering away from the teachings in the bible. Chris x

Asked what about the women? In Anglican Parishes there are many roles for women. Only thing not available is ordained clergy.
Carol, your role could easily be to mentor women, Bible studies various ministries from homeless, jail, education, catechist etc

Your priest would love to have someone come to him and say I want to serve instead of beating the bushes and hoping someone steps up.

Fr Mark

I agree Carol. I still think this is a larger problem across all patriarchal churches, but I’d like to see the Anglicans do better. It needs to be careful not to grow into another “Good ole boys club” where the women are relegated to cooking the food, watching the children and looking nice in pictures. They’ve successfully brought Christian orthodox men into the 21st Century, why can’t they do it with the other half of Christianity?

It’s also time to accept how many men and women are not getting married and learn to deal with it. I have lived as a single woman for decades, and my struggle has never been with myself – I long ago accepted that this is the role God has for me – but my struggle has always been the reaction of the church (in general, not necessarily Anglican). They just don’t know what to do with me. I’ve also had single men tell me that they have inadvertently been made to feel like they don’t fit in.

Another thing I see is a kind of worship of the PhD. Is this what the Bible teaches us? Hardly. We need testimonials from both men and women – we need to hear from the impoverished, the destitute, the ruined – those who have risen from the ashes thanks to Anglicanism. I have learned more from everyday people than I ever have from ivy league graduates and noble seminarians. I would like to see the new Anglicans keep some of what we’ve learned from the Evangelical movement — the tears, the dirt, and the baring of one’s soul – and stop panting after the next great learned leader.

PS I am a former Methodist who was confirmed in the Anglican church in 2021.

I’ve enjoyed these comments. As to teaching Bible studies, there are a couple problems. As the new person in a small congregation, we may not necessarily be trusted. Secondly, I have grown a passion for good study (anyone know of Michael Heiser?), and it would be hard to know where to start. Bottom line, however, is our Lord knows me, knows them and is quite able to find me a way to serve. In the meantime, I write to prisoners and would love to recruit for that ministry. There are not enough men who serve in this way.

As I understand it some of the ACNA dioceses ordain women as deacons and priests though the church does not ordain women to be bishops.

This is correct. Some dioceses do not ordain women at all (though those tend to have a non-ordained “deaconess” role), many ordain women but only to the diaconate, and some ordain women to the priesthood. The canons of the ACNA don’t allow women to be consecrated as bishops in order to preserve unity and cooperation within our structure and with our GAFCON partners.

Thank you. I, too, am a retired United Methodist clergy person who has found a spiritual home among the Anglicans. These people are my spiritual home.

As the various Methodist churches drift further away from the “old wine,” that Wesley liked best, I find myself more and more attracted to the Anglican mother church. If we had an Anglican church closer to us, we’d likely join. Perhaps one day.

KG – prayers for a fruitful journey. We love our church family at Holy Trinity Anglican Church Raleigh NC. Moved there Aug 2020.

What I don’t understand is why there so much difference between ACNA churches? I’ve attended a couple of ACNA churches and they were as different as night and day.