James, Brother of Jesus

James, the Brother of Jesus: Patron Saint of Late Believers

If you grew up with Christian family members but were weak in the faith yourself, James, the brother of Jesus, might be your patron saint! Think about it: James grew up with Jesus, observing his wisdom and goodness. He had personal access to the mind of the maker, an inside track to the Savior’s strength. But still, James did not believe. As Jesus put it: “A prophet is not without honor except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household” (Mark 6:4).

What finally convinced James was an encounter with the resurrected Jesus. Jesus had to become not more familiar to James, but less; then James could see Jesus in an entirely new light, and believe. Though James was a late believer, he became a church leader, serving as the bishop of Jerusalem and writing one of the New Testament’s greatest books. Most significantly, James played a decisive role in welcoming Gentiles into the church. As a late believer, James saw firsthand how God can draw all people to himself, even those who seem far off.

Sponsored

Jesus Had a Brother?

It’s easy to miss the fact that Jesus had brothers and sisters. The Christmas story focuses on Mary, Joseph, and baby Jesus, and most of our art of the Holy Family does the same. The gospels themselves don’t tell us much of Jesus’ boyhood, when we’d learn more about his siblings. And, most significant for this article, none of Jesus’ brothers become his close disciples during his life on earth.

But the scriptures do repeatedly speak of Jesus’ brothers and sisters, across all four gospels and in the letters of Paul. Matthew and Mark name the brothers from the mouth of the people of Nazareth, when they are shocked by Jesus’ wisdom:

Where did this man get this wisdom and these mighty works? Is not this the carpenterโ€™s son? Is not his mother called Mary? And are not his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? And are not all his sisters with us?

Matthew 13:54-56

Notice, however, that none of these brothers were included in Jesus’ twelve disciples (The disciples who share first names with Jesus’ brothers come from different familiesโ€”ie., James the son of Zebedee and James the son of Alphaeus). In fact, Jesus repeatedly downplayed his natural siblings in favor of his spiritual family:

Then his mother and his brothers came to him, but they could not reach him because of the crowd. And he was told, โ€œYour mother and your brothers are standing outside, desiring to see you.โ€ But he answered them, โ€œMy mother and my brothers are those who hear the word of God and do it.โ€

Luke 8:19-21

The context for Jesus’ teaching was not just the priority of obedience to God, but also the fact that Jesus’ family did not believe. The gospel of John is characteristically direct here:

For not even his brothers believed in him.

John 7:5

James the Late Believer

In Paul’s account of Jesus’ resurrection, he gives an explicit record of Jesus’ appearance to James:

He was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.

1 Corinthians 15:4-8

It’s interesting that James and Paul both appear late on this list, since both were late believers in Jesus Christ. We often contrast James and Paul because their letters emphasize different things, but in this respect they share the same story. Both were far off from God until they were called by the grace of the resurrected Christ.

For most late believers, I think James is the more relatable of the two. Of course there are the occasional converts who, like Paul, were actively persecuting the church before they repented and turned to Christ. But most are like James: they have some acquaintance with Jesus but remain lukewarm, believing one moment and doubting the next, unwilling to obey when obedience gets hard. I suspect that James was speaking from experience when he counseled that we pray in faith, without doubting:

The one who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. For that person must not suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord; he is a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways.

James 1:6-8

What finally brought James out of his double-mindedness was the appearance of the resurrected Christ, the Lord of the sea who had conquered even the storm of death. Finally, James could see that Jesus was more than his brother. He was indeed the son of a carpenter, but he was also the Son of God.

James the Bishop of Jerusalem

Though James had no significant role in Jesus’ ministry before the Lord’s crucifixion, he played a major role in the church’s emergence and development. He was with the disciples in Acts as they gathered in the Temple to receive the Holy Spirit:

All these with one accord were devoting themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and his brothers.

Acts 1:14

After Pentecost, James became a principal leader in the Jerusalem church, acting as an early bishop. We don’t know how James arrived in this position, but presumably his lifelong personal relationship with Jesus played a role. This role is implicit in several references to James: Peter in Acts 10, Paul in Galatians 1, and Jude in Jude 1.

The Council of Jerusalem

We see James’ leadership role most explicitly at the Council of Jerusalem, when early church leaders gathered to decide whether Gentiles could join the church. A group of former Pharisees argued that Gentiles must first undergo circumcision (ie., take on Jewish identity under the sign of the Old Covenant). In response, Peter argued that the Holy Spirit has come upon the Gentiles just as it came upon the Jewish apostles. Paul and Barnabas also shared the news of Gentile communities receiving the gospel.

The last person to speak is James, and he gives the final word:

After they finished speaking, James replied, โ€œBrothers, listen to me. Simeon has related how God first visited the Gentiles, to take from them a people for his name. And with this the words of the prophets agree…”

Acts 15:13-15

James then quotes Amos to show that the Old Testament had prophesied the inclusion of Gentiles. He establishes that this is now being fulfilled. Then, most strikingly, James concludes his speech with an authoritative judgment:

Therefore my judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who turn to God, but should write to them to abstain from the things polluted by idols, and from sexual immorality, and from what has been strangled, and from blood. For from ancient generations Moses has had in every city those who proclaim him, for he is read every Sabbath in the synagogues.

Acts 15:19-21

Notice the irony: James grew up hearing Jesus read Scripture on the Sabbath in the synagogue. Moreover, in that same context, some years earlier, the people of Nazareth, including James, had not believed in Jesus because he was too familiar. But James knew the God who still gave him grace and mercy, who revealed himself through the resurrected Christ and poured out his Holy Spirit.

Now this same Christ was giving the same Holy Spirit to a new generation of Gentiles. James was the right man, in the right place, with the right position and experience. One late believer welcomed a whole community of late believers: a faithful Jew welcoming the Gentiles into the faith. James’ own faith in Christ eventually led to his own martyrdom, with the scribes and Pharisees in Jerusalem beating him to death with a fuller’s club after throwing him from the pinnacle of the Temple.

Spiritual Brothers and Natural Brothers

As we commemorate James, the brother of Jesus, let’s remember that James had to repent and believe before he could rediscover his brotherhood with Jesus. In other words, a shared set of parents was not enough to sustain the fraternity between James and Jesus.

And so it is with us. The differences that develop between natural brothers and other family members are resolved only when we all submit to the same Lord. To be restored to each other, we must first turn to God.

Surely James spoke from his own experience in the closing lines of his letter. It is the happy witness of a late believer, inspiring us also to seek and save the lost:

My brothers, if anyone among you wanders from the truth and someone brings him back, let him know that whoever brings back a sinner from his wandering will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins.

James 5:19-20

Image: St. James, Brother of the Lord. Miniature from the Menologion of Basil II, Constantinople (985 AD). Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. Digitally edited by Jacob Davis.

Author

Peter Johnston

The Ven. Dr. Peter Johnston is the Ministry President of Anglican Compass. He is a priest and archdeacon in the Anglican Diocese of All Nations and the rector of Trinity Lafayette. He lives with his wife, Carla, and their nine children near Lafayette, Louisiana.

View more from Peter Johnston

Comments

Please comment with both clarity and charity!

Subscribe to Comments
Notify of
12 Comments

Thank you for this insightful article. I never really thought about this before- that Jesus own brother didnโ€™t believe! It gives me a lot of food for thought as I try to deal with unbelieving family members.

According to various traditions, James, the brother of the Lord, and James the Less, the apostle, are considered to be the same person.

Last edited 20 days ago by Patrick Lim

Thank you for the clarification! I am an ACC priest and use the 1928 Book of Common Prayer, where this feast is not included in the calendar. That was why I simply left a comment noting that other historical tradition regarding James’s identity.

Father, I wish you had taken more time to dicuss the tradition that St. James was likely the cousin, not the brother of our Lord.

It’s well known that in an ancient Jewish context, the Greek word for โ€˜brothersโ€™ (adelphoi) could be used as a synonym for close relatives, such as cousins. The tradition of the Church gives much greater creedance to the view that James and Joses were cousins of Jesus, through Joseph’s brother being married to Mary of Clopas, than as further children of Mary and Joseph.

Furthermore, in Johnโ€™s account, Jesus gives his mother to the Beloved Disciple to have as โ€˜his ownโ€™ mother (John 19:26-27). If Mary would have had any other children at the time of the crucifixion, it would have been unheard of for Jesus to give his mother to one of his disciples!

Last edited 14 days ago by Aaron Poole

Greetings Peter, thank you for responding. You edited out the most compelling textual evidence for Jesus’ brothers and sisters being the children of Mary and Clopas. Who were Jesus’ supposed other ‘brothers’? James, Jospeh, Simon and Jude. It’s well know that the first two, were the first and second Bishops of Jerusalem. It was also well known they were Jesus’ cousins, children of “the other Mary” (Matthew 28:1). Let me give a small sample of ancient Christian writings on this issue:

“The same writer [Hegesippus] also [writes]… as follows: ‘After James the Just had suffered martydom for the same reason as the Lord, Simon, his cousin, the son of Clopas, was appointed bishop, whom they all proposed because he was another cousin (Greek anepsion) of the Lord.'” (Hegesippius [2nd century A.D.], quoted in Eusbius, Church History)
“If she [Mary] had had other children, the Saviour would not have ignored them and entrusted his Mother to someone else; nor would she have become someone else’s mother (Athanasius, On Virginity [4th century AD])
“Already before he was concieved he wished to choose for himself, in order to be born, a virgin who was consecrated to God, as is indicated by the words with which Mary responded to the angel, who was announcing her imminent motherhood: ‘How shall this be done, because I know not man?’ (Luke 1:34). And she certainly would not have responded in such a way if she had not already made a vow of virginity” (Augustine, On Holy Virginity [early 5th century]”

As the Anglican scholar J.H. Bernard puts it: “It is difficult to understand how the doctrine of the [perpetual] Virginity of Mary could have grown up early in the second century if her four acknowledged sons were prominent Christians, and one of them bishop of Jerusalem”.

The doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary has been held by the Church since at least the second century, east and west, Latin and Greek, even by all of the main Reformers. It seems a case of epistemic hubris for us to think that a scholar(s) has come to the correct conclusion nearly 2,000 years later!

Hello Peter, thank you for your response. Upon your prompting I’ve taken a further deep dive into this question, and it is fascinating. As Lightfoot points out, there are three main views to explain who Jesus’ brothers were: Epiphanian (step-brothers), Helvidian (brothers) or Hieronymian (cousins). My view would be that there is no way we can definitlivly settle – using Scripture, tradition and reason – which view is correct. All three theories have strong arguments for and against them. However, what we do know is that the Perpetual Virginity of Mary has been held by most Christians throughout most of history. Thus, one has two options. One can affirm the historical witness of the Church, meaning that only the Epiphanian or Hieronymian view is true. Or, one can deny the Perpetual Virginity (a tricky position to take if one takes tradition seriously), in which case the helvidian view is a viable option.