Washington and Pohick Church

George Washington: Vestryman and Lifelong Anglican

George Washington was born into a deeply Anglican family and remained a faithful Anglican layman for his entire life. He was baptized in the church as an infant, married a pious Anglican woman, and was buried with the burial office from the 1789 Book of Common Prayer.

In between these sacramental milestones, Washington served as the victorious General of the American Revolution and the first President of the United States. As a public figure, Washington did not write specifically of his Anglican heritage, preferring to encourage Christianity in general as a bulwark for a free people. But in his practice, both before and during his public service, Washington was a devoted member and servant of the church, revealing his religion through his deeds.

Sponsored

Washington’s most remarkable service to the church was as a vestryman. Beginning in 1762 and continuing until 1784, he served on the vestry of Truro Parish, in which capacity he took the leading role in constructing a new building for Pohick Church. He also formed important friendships with other members of the vestry, including George Mason and Rev. Lee Massey, which would subsequently shape the American Revolution.

The imprint of Washington’s Anglicanism also came through in his conduct in public office, especially in the profound humility of his subservience to higher authority. As a General and a President, he always retained a mindset of service to the people of America, to their elected representatives, and to God above all. Such Christian humility is the ultimate explanation for Washington’s epochal decision, on two separate occasions, to resign the highest office in the land.

Here are the final words of Washington’s service as general, delivered to the Continental Congress on the occasion of his first resignation:

I now make it my earnest prayer, that God would have you, and the State over which you preside, in his holy protection…and finally, that he would most graciously be pleased to dispose us all, to do Justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that Charity, humility, and pacific temper of mind, which were the Characteristicks of the Divine Author of our blessed Religion, and without an humble imitation of whose example in these things, we can never hope to be a happy Nation.

Circular to the States: June 8, 1783

The Washingtons: A Deeply Anglican Family

George Washington was born into a family with a long history of service to the Anglican Church. As far back as the 12th century, the family had a distinct relationship with the Bishop of Durham and lived in the Washington Old Hall in northeast England. For our purposes, it will also be helpful to mention the four generations before George.

  • Lawrence Washington (1602–1652) served as an Oxford don and Anglican priest under Charles I and Archbishop Laud. During the English Civil War, he was deprived of his livelihood and died in poverty.
  • John Washington (1633–1677) emigrated to Virginia after the death of his father. He arrived in 1657, married the daughter of a wealthy planter in 1659, and became a Vestryman of Appomattox Parish in 1661. In 1664, the parish was renamed Washington Parish, reflecting John’s growing leadership role. Though details of the next decade are scarce, John likely helped call the parish rector, to whom he bequeathed significant funds in his will.
  • Lawrence Washington (1659–1698) was named after his priestly grandfather. He died young, but not before a consequential marriage that enlarged the family’s land holdings and produced three children, including George’s father, Augustine.
  • Augustine Washington (1694–1743) became a vestryman of Truro Parish in 1735, when his son George was three years old. The following year, he nominated Charles Green to become the parish’s first rector. When Augustine died, George was 11.

Though George never met his grandfather, he would have grown up with the stories of all these generations, deeply aware of the family legacy of service to the church. While he was a boy, he attended services with his vestryman father, and once his father died, the church would remain a constant reminder of his father and the Washington legacy.

Military Service and Divine Providence

George’s religiosity was refined by his early experience as an officer in the French and Indian War. The defining moment was the Battle of the Monongahela in 1755, when Washington was 23. Serving as an aide to British General Braddock, Washington provided gallant service in the midst of a rout of the British forces. Braddock was killed, alongside more than 800 casualties, in a force of 1300.

That George survived seemed to him, and to many others in the field that day, to be a kind of miracle. George attributed his survival to Providence, as he wrote to his brother:

I am still in the land of the living by the miraculous care of Providence, that protected me beyond all human expectation; I had 4 Bullets through my Coat, and two Horses shot under me yet escaped unhurt.

Letter to John Augustine Washington, July 18 1755

Subsequently, Washington was appointed the commander of the Virginia Regiment, in which capacity he repeatedly lobbied the governor and legislature to appoint a chaplain to the regiment. When a new acting governor was appointed, Washington renewed his request:

Common decency, Sir, in a camp calls for the services of a Divine; and which ought not to be dispensed with, altho’ the world should be so uncharitable as to think us void of Religion, & incapable of good Instructions.

Letter to Acting Governing John Blair, April 17, 1758

George Washington as a Vestryman

Refined by this early experience and newly married to Martha Custis, George returned to civilian life in the pattern of his father. In 1762, he was selected to serve as a vestryman in Truro Parish, the same parish in which his father served. The historical record even preserves a signed resubscription document, dated from 1765, in which Washington swore the customary oath:

I, AB, do declare that I will be conformable to the Doctrine and Discipline of the Church of England, as by law established.

As cited by Lossing, in the Pictorial Field Book of the Revolution, p. 215

By 1765, Washington was also serving as Warden, or one of the Vestry’s leaders. In this role, George administered the church’s business, including payment of church staff salaries, maintenance of church property, and distribution of charitable funds. At the end of the year, parish rector Charles Green died. Following in his father’s footsteps, one of George’s earliest actions was to nominate Lee Massey as the new rector of the parish; Massey sailed for England in 1766, where he was ordained, and returned to serve the parish in 1767.

According to Massey (as recorded later by Bishop Meade), Washington was not only a reliable Vestryman, but also a good example of piety to his fellow parishioners:

I never knew so constant an attendant in church as Washington. And his behaviour in the house of God was ever so deeply reverential that it produced the happiest effects on my congregation, and greatly assisted me in my pulpit labours. No company ever withheld him from church.

Rev. Lee Massey, as recorded by Bishop Meade in Old Churches, Ministers and Families of Virginia (1857)

Massey (or Meade) may have been exaggerating a bit here, since Washington’s own diaries do record many Sundays when he was not able to make the seven-mile journey on horseback to church. But the general impression of Washington’s consistent piety is right. On Sundays, when he did not attend church, he would still set aside time to read prayers and sermons to the family at home. Later, when Washington served as President and lived in a city with churches nearby, he made a point of attending weekly.

The Construction of Pohick Church

The most significant project Washington undertook as a vestryman and churchwarden was the construction of a new building at Pohick. The vestry decided to build in 1767, but there was disagreement on which location to use. Washington personally surveyed a new plot of land and successfully advocated for it in the vestry. Construction began in 1769 under Daniel French, a member of the congregation.

Here, it is important to note that much of the labor for the construction of Pohick Church would have been provided by African-American slaves. This is not only because slaves were often involved in such projects, but also because Washington himself and multiple other members of the church owned slaves and could make them available for parts of the project. It must also be frankly acknowledged that Washington’s ownership of slaves, however conventional for the time, and even though he did manumit his slaves in his will, remains a stain upon his legacy.

Though we do not know all the details of the slaves who worked on the project, the beautiful building that still stands is a testament to their skill and their good work, even under unjust exploitation. They are known to God and will be rewarded by him.

The Architecture of Pohick Church

Designed by James Wren, the building is a two-story Georgian in brick with carved sandstone detailing. The structure reflected the restrained elegance of colonial Anglican architecture. The interior was furnished with an elevated pulpit and commandment boards, both reflecting the twin reformed emphases on scripture and catechesis. Visitors today might be most taken with the box pews, which families would rent to provide the necessary funds for the church’s ongoing ministry (Washington rented two box pews, his larger contribution reflecting his economic and social standing).

Pohick Church was completed in 1774, but Washington barely had any time to enjoy it. Almost immediately, he was caught up in the revolution and required to live far away. But Washington always wanted to come home to Mount Vernon and to Pohick Church. Both as a General and as a President, he would frequently cite his favorite verse from Micah:

[The Lord] shall judge between many peoples and shall decide disputes for strong nations far away; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore; but they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree, and no one shall make them afraid.

Micah 4:3-4
Pohick Church, photos courtesy of Hamilton Historical Records

The Vestry and the Revolution

We don’t have space to consider every aspect of Washington’s religiosity during his service as a general and then as President. However, it is striking to consider the way the relationships Washington forged on the Truro vestry fed into the development of the American Revolution.

The key detail here is that one of Washington’s fellow vestrymen was George Mason, a brilliant mind who helped to develop the intellectual framework for the revolution. In 1774, Washington commissioned Mason to draft a set of resolutions in response to England’s Coercive Acts, also called the Intolerable Acts, which punished the colonies for the Boston Tea Party. Mason brought a first draft to Mount Vernon, and after revision, the two men went to Alexandria, where a larger group of landowners, including rector Lee Massey, received and signed them together.

The resulting document, called the Fairfax Resolves, became deeply influential in Virginia and one of the most important precedents for Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence in 1776. Moreover, Washington and Mason forged an alliance that would continue for more than a decade, until it broke down during the Constitutional Convention. Mason refused to support the Constitution because it didn’t include a Bill of Rights. Washington broke with Mason to support the Constitution, but then, as President, made it a first order of business to adopt a Bill of Rights after all.

In Conclusion: Washington’s Providential King

While it is certainly true that Washington never saw himself as a pastor or a Christian evangelist, it is also not possible to consider him a deist in the model of Thomas Jefferson. Contrary to the deist idea of a God who creates but then abandons the field of history, Washington repeatedly referred to God as a Providential King who governs in the affairs of man. Washington was able to reject the King of England because he believed in the King of the Universe. Even more powerfully, Washington was able to resist the call to make himself King because he knew he had one in heaven.

At his first inauguration as President, it was Washington who added “so help me God” to the oath of office. And in his first inaugural address, Washington insisted that the only proper way to begin his service to the nation was with prayer to “the Great Author of every public and private good.” As Washington put it:

It would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official Act, my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the Universe, who presides in the Councils of Nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that his benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the People of the United States.

First Inaugural Address, April 30, 1789

I dedicate this article to the members of the vestry of Trinity Lafayette, especially those who have assisted in the construction of our new church building. May it encourage you to follow in the footsteps of George Washington and take comfort in the fact that his building project took seven years!


Image: George Washington painting by William Winstanley (ca.1803) from incamerastock via Alamy and Canva. Pohick Church postcard from Boston Public Library, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons (Creative Commons 2.0). Digital collage by Jacob Davis.

Author

Peter Johnston

The Ven. Dr. Peter Johnston is the Ministry President of Anglican Compass. He is a priest and archdeacon in the Anglican Diocese of All Nations and the rector of Trinity Lafayette. He lives with his wife, Carla, and their nine children near Lafayette, Louisiana.

View more from Peter Johnston

Comments

Please comment with both clarity and charity!

Subscribe to Comments
Notify of
11 Comments

Excellent article, Father. I especially appreciated your emphasis on Washington’s years as a vestryman. Too often discussions of his faith focus almost exclusively on his public statements or his use of the language of Providence. By highlighting his decades of quiet service in the parish—helping govern, build, and support the Church—you remind us that the strongest evidence of a man’s convictions is often found in his faithful actions rather than his public words.
As an Anglican priest, I also appreciated your reminder that the colonial vestry was not merely an honorary position but an important ministry of stewardship and service. Thank you for a thoughtful and well-researched piece.

Washington is complex. He did free his slaves upon his death but not the slaves that had been owned by his wife. It is also reported that on a couple of occasions he refused to be a God Parent because he would not commit to teach the child that which Washington himself did not believe. It is also recorded that Washington usually left church after the litany of the Word and before the linany of the Eucarist. All sinners forgiven by the grace of God are a mix of good and not so good. I think it is healthy for us to learn both sides as it reminds us that we all need Christ.
God bless you and thank you for your article.
David

Re: Taking vows as a godparent: I believe David has confused an old argument here. Thomas Jefferson reportedly refused to be a godparent (citing that he could not vow to teach a child what he didn’t believe), thus Washington serving as a godparent is circumstantial evidence that he at least didn’t reject the Apostles Creed.

Re: Eucharistic non-reception: I think Peter is minimizing the problem here. Reports of whether he ever took communion at all (including prior to his public life) are contradictory, but the fact that he never took communion during his public career (including leaving services early and sending a carriage back for Martha) is a major issue that was noticed and considered unusual for his time.

Re: Slavery:Not all of the enslaved people at Mount Vernon were part of Martha’s dowry, and George didn’t free any of them except his personal valet (he seems to have wanted Martha to free the rest on her death, she did not do so). This was complicated by many factors (including everything from financial concerns to the fact that some but not all families might have been split up if only some of the enslaved people at Mt. Vernon were freed). It’s also notable that George was was disliked by most of the enslaved people who served him, became furious at runaways, supported gradual abolition and ending of the international trade, but was also upset by Britain’s refusal to return runaways who escaped to Canada. Ultimately his participation in that awful institution was complicated, but he was neither the best nor the worst of the Virginia plantation owners of his day.

Ultimately I think GW is best understood as an enigma, we really don’t (and can’t) know much about what he believed because he was intentionally private to the point of secrecy about his own beliefs.
People who knew him held a wide range of opinions about his faith (or lack thereof) and many traditions sought to claim him (there are reasonably plausible if unlikely accounts of secret conversions as either a Catholic or a Baptist) and thus even primary sources should be taken with a healthy dose of skepticism.

For further reading, I suggest starting here:
https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/george-washington-and-religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington_and_slavery
https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/subject/enslaved-community-and-slavery

I always appreciate your articles and found this one particularly interesting.
I have been to Pohick Church and felt the presence of the Lord and the prayers of many Saints there. Today on the fourth of July, I am more grateful and aware of the sacrifices that George Washington made that impacts our lives today.
Thanks be to God.

Washington was coming from a Latitudinarian Low Churchmanship way.

This is a great article on Washington. His Anglicanism was at the core of his being.