Is Anglicanism Catholic or Protestant?

Roman Catholic? Reformed? Protestant?

Most Americanย evangelicals experience a church world that is eitherย protestant and Reformed orย Roman Catholic. You have to be one or the other. For many, ‘catholic’ means “Roman Catholic”; ‘Reformed’ means “Calvinist.” “Protestant” means “Non-Roman Catholic.” The Eastern Orthodox churches in these discussions are largely unconcerned. Anglicanism, however, had a unique, rich history that complicates these neat labeling systems. It does not neatly fit into predefined categories.

Anglicanism: Both Reformed & Catholic

Anglicans tend to define their church as both Catholic and Reformational, or both Catholic and Evangelical. When we say catholic, we don’t mean we are Roman Catholic. Also, when we say reformed, we don’t necessarily mean we are all Calvinists.

Sponsored

For example, I have two portraits hanging on the wall in my study. One is a picture of Pope Gregory commissioning Augustine of Canterbury to go to England to establish communion between the Church in England and the Roman Catholic church. The other, next to it, is Archbishop Thomas Cranmer. He was the first reformational Archbishop of Canterbury and a father of the Reformation movement.

Each is juxtaposed, with no seeming contradiction. I have books on my shelf by John Stott and John Henry Newman. My crucifix sits next to an ESV Study Bible. I believe in Christ’s Real Presence in the Eucharist; I also believe in the priesthood of all believers.

Some Anglican History

Interjecting some Anglican history might clarify any confusion. The British Isles are those where the Anglican church was originally planted. Christianity came to these Isles at some time in the late first or early second century, possibly along with the Roman army. It could also be through some early eastern-Celtic missionaries. Later, Pope Gregory sent Augustine of Canterbury to evangelize the British Isles in 596 AD. The church in that part of the world came into communion with the catholic (i.e., worldwide) church at that time. Yet, it had previously existed in all ages.

But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering, and to the assembly of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect, and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel.

Hebrews 12:22-24

We say when we claim catholic that our church is a continuation of the church in those early days. In that time, the Christian Church was undivided and universal. Skip ahead a thousand years. Now it’s the Reformation. The Church in England went through a reformation period, initiated in full by Archbishop Thomas Cranmer. He was influenced by both Geneva (Calvinists) and Germany (Lutherans). This, along with the next century of arguments, persecutions, wrangling, and disputes, shaped a reformed and yet still catholic Anglican church.

Where Anglicanism Split from Rome

Now, the English Reformation was a split with Rome in certain respects. Consider that the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion state that

As the Church of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, have erred, so also the Church of Rome hath erred, not only in their living and manner of Ceremonies, but also in matters of Faith. … The Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory, Pardons, Worshipping and Adoration, as well of Images as of Relics, and also Invocation of Saints, is a fond thing, vainly invented, and grounded upon no warranty of scripture, but rather repugnant to the Word of God.

39 Articles of Religion, Articles 19, 22

However, rather than leaving behind the catholic faith and becoming only protestant, the Anglican reformation ended up reforming the existing catholic church in England. This is why Bishops were retained, and priests, along with sacramental theology and liturgy.

It’s fair to say that Anglicans have, on the whole, a stronger sense of the authority of the Church invisible and of church traditions than some other Protestants do. Be this as it may, though the authority and traditions of the Church carry weight within the Anglican tradition, the Bible is the final arbiter in all matters. Traditions and authority form its supporting legs.

Of the Authority of the Church: The Church hath power to decree Rites or Ceremonies, and authority in Controversies of Faith: and yet it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God’s Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another. Wherefore, although the Church be a witness and a keeper of Holy Writ, yet, as it ought not to decree any thing against the same, so besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be believed for necessity of Salvation.

39 Articles, Article 20

Eventually, Anglicans sought communion with the Roman church and the Orthodox churches, alongside continuing fellowship with other Protestant churches. We have something in common with all of these traditions in a great via media, middle way. Nonetheless, the Anglican communion today does not have official fellowship with our Roman counterparts, unlike the sister church status it holds with the Orthodox Chuch.

The English ruled the seas, began to colonize the known world. They spread this reformed catholic faith all over the world, not always gently (to put it mildly). The American Revolution birthed what became an Anglican church in the United States. It was independent politically while remaining in full communion with the Church of England. Likewise, this new Episcopalian church found itself somewhat unique due to the lack of a monarchy in its new constitutional republic. This became a pattern all over the former empire during decolonization. A new chapter in our history began rather than forming a new church.

In some phases of its history, the Anglican church has emphasized its Protestant or Reformed reality and de-emphasized its catholic nature. Such times included the evangelical revivals of the 18th century. At other times, such as during the 19th century Oxford Movement, there has been a revival of the catholic spirituality or vision. But both of these influences have remained.

Maintaining the Anglican Tension

The Anglican church is a reformed catholic church. We don’t see a fundamental conflict between the words evangelical and catholic. Nor do we feel the need to choose between our catholic ancestors and our reformational ones. This can confuse some who think on these things as antitheses. For Anglicans, though they are often in tension, they are both necessary to retain and to live into. It is not a life of either/or tension, but both/and. We accept the best from each.


Photo by: Fabien TWB on Unsplash

Author

The Anglican Pastor

A classic resource from the founding team of Anglican Compass.

View more from The Anglican Pastor

Comments

Please comment with both clarity and charity!

Subscribe to Comments
Notify of
37 Comments

Appreciated “Info”, There’s more to the “History”. A study of history of Glastonbury,England, Joseph of Aramathia, and the rest of the book of Acts (29th CH.with it’s Amen) should provide “The rest of “The” Story”! Blessings, DJ

Enjoyed your piece. A lot.
IMHO, the tension you refer to at the end surely exists but should be expressed as: the tension is a creative force, built in by Cranmer and many others, instead of being a negative one. It is necessary to maintaining a healthy if occasionally deeply worrisome and contentious balance between equally important, competing elements. After all, who promised us in its pursuit and application of Anglican understanding in a broken world a neat, tidy, static form of the faith expressed? No one. Our enemy has always been the mistaken, corrupting pursuit of Christ convenient, Christ controlled and Christ comfortable which the evil one dangled before Jesus. Those who discovered the essentials of the Anglican Tradition understood this well, even if they never said so. Their dedicated faith, multifaceted gifts to us and its durable strength against repeated assaults say so, tension, vision and all.
The pain caused by the tension is just weakness leaving our spiritual body.

For us, though they are often in
tension, they are both necessary to retain and to live into.

Greg,

Something I have realised over the years is that labels mean different things to different people in different places. In answer to your question in your OP, I would say “it depends” on what you mean by the term ‘Catholic’. If you mean it as it is defined in the Apostle Creed, meaning Universal, then I would say yes we are catholic and reformed. However if the term catholic implies thatthe Anglican Church is reformed Catholicism (the middle way between Rome and Geneva),then I disagree. The Anglican Church is protestant and reformed, and the via media is more accurately described as a via media between Martin Luther’s Wittenberg and John Calvin’s Geneva.

Not trying to start an argument, I am just a fellow Anglican Priest from Australia offering a view.

Grace and peace
Joshua
p.s Love your website.

Thank you for sharing that perspective. And thanks for reading! Blessings on your ministry.

Thank you. Good point.

This is great, Greg! This is a very confusing thing in a world that likes to divide and draw lines. Thanks for writing it and sharing it again!

I’ve been an Anglican for 6 1/2 years. In that time I’ve had some great teachers who’ve helped me understand Anglicanism.You really summed it up in an easily understood way. I can’t tell you how much I appreciate your writings and those of your fellow pastors. I always learn something and I feel like I have a deeper understanding of Anglicanism because of this website. May God bless you all!

Thank you!

Most importantly, where can I get a crucifix like the one in the photo?

I believe thatโ€™s a Benedictine cross. They do have them at our local monastery bookstore here.

Thanks a lot. I have been an Anglican since I was born in 1996 but I find so many things in common with the Catholic dogmas however during the confirmation classes we were taught the true meaning of the word Catholic (universal) according to the former reformer-archbishop Thomas Cranmer. However, as an Evangelical Anglican, I find my church only recognizes two main sacraments; baptism and holy communion. I disagree with RCC on Mariology, purgatory, venerating the saints (interceptions), their understanding of the Eucharist (Transubstantiation vs Consubstatiation), soteriology etc

Great article and quite helpful.
I think the readers comment that the tension of these ways of being faithful precedes the reformation (going back at least to Patrick, Celtic missionaries and such) is also a good one. Though we are and have always been catholic, weโ€™ve not always been Roman.

Sorry to have to disagree but the Anglican Church was thoroughly Protestant from its beginning in 1559 up until the middle of the Nineteenth Century: I’m afraid the historic Catholicity of the Anglican Church is an illusion largely created by Victorian Restorationism. Before that period, Churches were whitewashed and devoid of any adornmenthird apart from a chained Bible and two boards with the.Ten Commandments printed on one, and the Our Father and Apostle Creed on the other. Priests wore no vestments apart from a cassock and surpluses (or rochet if they were a bishop) and an academic scarf. The liturgy was strictly from BCP and couldn’t possibly be mistaken for a Catholic liturgy, and the official doctrine was Calvanist.

Where is your evidence to back up this statement? I would be interested to read it.

True Anglicanism is best described as a reformed church with catholic hierarchy an democratic voting on leaders. To me, the 39 articles are what defines Anglicanism, and those 39 articles defininitely fit within the reformed sphere of churches. For anyone who is interested in learning about what Anglicanism is, I would recommend reading the 39 articles of our faith.

Ditto to John and Simon. There are so many errors here it’s difficult to know where to begin. This article represents the American evangelical romantacism in the ACNA that is not only confused, but contradictory at heart. Being “Anglican” means almost anything you want it to mean because ‘Anglican’ is whatever you throw in the ecclesiastical pot and mix up. It is a ‘choose-your-own-adventure’, which is why you can put an icon next to an iconoclast and quote with approval both Martin Luther and a theologian who rejected Protestantism (Newman) without grimacing. This is not a sign of strength — it is a sign of confusion. We really need to read our primary sources. Can you locate a single Anglican for the first several hundred years after the English reformation(s) that uses the word ‘catholic’ to refer medieval precedents and practices? Even Laud – the highest ‘church’ ever got – was a Protestant. Lancelot Andrewes thought eucharistic adoration was an abomination. John Jewel argued Protestantism is MORE catholic than catholicism. By the early 17th century, the Anglican church was clearly aligned with the continental reformation. The 39 Articles are strongly Calvinistic. There are no scholars or historians who deny this. It is only romanticized evangelical converts who think the Anglican church is the Disney land of the Christian church where every theological dream comes true. Anglicanism has confessional boundaries. Why do ACNA folks convert to Roman Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy? Its because their ACNA church is a theological playground that plays Roman Catholic dress up.

Greg, the article was very well balanced. You are getting some negative responses from fridge Anglo-calvinists. They think that the AC is just the English version of the continental Calvinist reformed. The retention of the threefold ministry, the rejection of the regulative principle, and falling from grace (article 16)are distinctions from Calvinism. This is not to deny Calvinismโ€™s influence but there are other influences, the AC is it own distinct communion. The Anglo Catholics also have there own fridge in which they reject the reformation and think the AC is the RC without the pope. The 16th century English reformers, the Caroline devines, and the Oxford movement (Pusey not Newman) were much more in harmony that the fridge elements want to concede.

I am disappointed that Anglican Pastor declined to post my comment which was in no way inflammatory or offensive. I provided further evidence of the Protestant and Reformed character of the Anglican Church until the Oxford movement and its spin offs sought to change the identity of the Anglican Church. I suggested that Greg might benefit from further reading as he appeared to have been misinformed regarding the nature of authentic historic Anglicanism. I suggested a number of authors that he would benefit from reading. I also do not understand why Anglican Pastor would permit the posting of a comment in which derogatory terms like “fridge” are used. The use of such terms I believe is not conducive to the kind of discourse that Anglican Pastor seeks to encourage.

Robin, I donโ€™t recall deleting any comments, but if it was a while back I may have?

We are happy to have various perspectives so please feel free to post your original thoughts.

โ€œChristianity came to these Isles at some time in the late first or early second century, possibly along with the Roman army, or through some early eastern/celtic missionariesโ€. Yes, Britain was already Christian before Augustine arrived. This is surprising to some people. This was Orthodoxy, i.e.ancient Christianity.