Anglicans & Roman Catholics
Anglicans are sometimes said to be “a little bit Protestant and a little bit Roman Catholic.” That’s probably true to some extent as a description of what people see in a worship service. We Anglicans see ourselves as both fully catholic and as a church of the Reformation at the same time. Because we are the most visibly catholic church in the West that isn’t Roman, people often wonder about what we think of the Roman Catholics.
Recently, I was asked if Roman Catholics are “saved.” Unfortunately, I was asked this question in the middle of a holiday party at my son’s local public school, in front of all the other parents. Needless to say, I invited the other dad to get some coffee and discuss it at another time. The timing of his question wasn’t so great, but the question itself is important to many evangelicals and deserves a response. Even though it might feel offensive to many Roman Catholics, it shows a concern for truth that should be important for all of us.
Sponsored
There are official dialogues that go on between Anglicans and Roman Catholics, and you can find out about those in many places (including here). I’m not so much writing about the official relationships or ecumenical dialogues here, though. My experience is more in how Anglicans generally talk about and think about the Romans as a part of our everyday life and experience. I’ll mostly address the kinds of questions evangelicals ask us. I’m sure some of my fellow Anglicans will disagree with my assessment, which is mostly positive. I welcome other viewpoints, but I want to share what I’ve personally observed.
The Pope of Rome
While most Anglicans regard the papacy with respect, we do not see the Pope as the final authority in the Church. This is because we believe in a conciliar model of leadership, similar to our Eastern Orthodox brothers and sisters. We hold that the highest level of authority under Christ the Head should resemble the Twelve Apostles acting together in council. Therefore, we disagree that one Bishop should hold final, supreme authority over the others, even as one presides over the group. This foundational belief is why we reject the doctrine of papal infallibility, even when the Pope speaks ex cathedra.
Furthermore, this divergence in authority and belief has practical consequences. Our Roman Catholic brothers and sisters do not recognize Anglican holy orders. In the 1896 papal bull Apostolicae Curae, Pope Leo XIII declared all Anglican ordinations to be “utterly null and void,” a position that remains true to this day. This has made our participation in the sacraments together normally (though not always, under specific provisions) impossible. The division has driven some Anglicans over the years to join the Catholic Church, especially after Pope Benedict XVI created the Personal Ordinariate for those converts, which incorporates some elements of Anglican tradition within a newly developed version of the Roman rite. However, there has been a recent renewal of warmth between Roman Catholic and Anglican leadership, and even talk of eventual full communion between Rome and some Anglican provinces.
A Christian Church?
Anglicans believe that the Roman Catholic Church is a true Christian Church. We may have issues with some of their theology and practice, even serious issues, but we affirm their faith in Jesus Christ. The Roman Catholic Church affirms the creeds, Holy Scripture, and the orthodox faith. They preach that Jesus is the incarnate Son of God who died for us and who rose again. Even when we see what we think are errors, most Anglicans still affirm the true faith in Jesus that is very visible in that communion.
Salvation by Grace
It’s almost universally believed by Protestant and evangelical groups that the Romans believe in grace plus works for salvation. My experience is that many Anglicans do think that the Roman Catholics add works to grace. I don’t necessarily disagree with that assessment; to some degree, so do we. Anglicans, evangelicals, human beings, etc. We all add our works to God’s grace to try to appease or please him. It’s human nature.
Yes, there have been times in the Roman Church’s life in which it seemed to pretty clearly affirm the idea that we can add some of our good works and merit to our spiritual bank account with God. But you can find that same thinking even in, for example, the American Puritans. Yes, even the Puritans wrote about “proving your election.” You proved it by your good works.
The Roman Catholic Church has changed significantly since the Reformation, especially since Vatican II. There is a conscious movement and effort to move away from semi-Pelagianism (human achievement as a part of salvation). I think most Anglicans recognize and appreciate that move, and we would be well to continue in that direction ourselves.
The Blessed Virgin Mary
There are some Anglicans who pray to Mary, who see her as “ever” virgin, and who venerate her in ways that would make Thomas Cranmer roll over in his grave. So those Anglicans don’t have a problem with the way Roman Catholics venerate Mary. Most of us agree with the Roman Catholics who have pointed out some of the idolatry associated with Mary. Yet, the Roman Catholics have retained (at the very center of the Christian life) the beautiful vision of a woman, pregnant with God’s Son, delivering him into the world. Mother of God, Mother of the Church. Forever blessed, honored throughout all generations. Protestants tend to diminish the Blessed Mary or speak of her role in salvation history negatively. Anglicans tend to talk about Mary more, to honor her, and to see her as an icon, a way to see God.
And Mary said, “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, for he has looked on the humble estate of his servant. For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed; for he who is mighty has done great things for me,
Luke 1:46-49
and holy is his name.
Whereas most Anglicans would encourage Roman Catholics who pray to statues of Mary or see her as a co-redeemer with Christ to desist from an unbiblical practice, we don’t think they should abandon their tendency to honor or her place as the Mother of God.
Authority
Is the Bible our only authority? We see it as the final authority and as the unique authority (the only inspired book). Nothing can take its place. Yet unlike protestants and most evangelicals, we value other authorities, although they aren’t equal to Scripture. Roman Catholics have a similar view. They see Holy Scripture as the top level, but they think that it is mediated through the Church. Anglicans think that the Church is subject to Scripture, and so this creates some interesting arguments about what Scripture teaches. The Roman system might appear more practical, though we fear that it unintentionally subjects Scripture to the Church. Anglicans disapprove.
However, it’s untrue that the Roman Catholic Church doesn’t believe in the Bible, or isn’t biblical. Their Catechism shows that they seek to understand Tradition in light of Scripture. Unlike many evangelical or protestant groups, we tend to understand why the Roman Catholics believe in an authoritative teaching body, even though we don’t agree that that body is authorized by Jesus himself.
Transubstantiation
We reject transubstantiation (as stated in the 39 Articles). However, what we don’t believe is really what Roman Catholics today don’t believe either. Confusing? Yes, it is. Anglicans believe that Jesus is spiritually present in the Communion. We don’t believe in requiring people to believe in a particular way that he does that. Roman Catholics, however, do require people to believe in a formula used to precisely spell out the presence of Christ—that the bread and wine truly and fully become his flesh and blood—and they call it transubstantiation. Both churches believe that the bread and wine are a means of grace and that Jesus is present there.
We aren’t supposed to reserve the sacrament (except for the sick). They do. They put it in a chapel, and people pray there in the presence of the sacrament. The piety of the folks who gather there is without question, and their love for Jesus is obvious if you’ve ever observed people praying in front of the sacrament. However, we believe we did not receive the Eucharist as something separate from the gathered church. We partake in it as a meal; we do not put it on display. Some Anglicans find this to be a serious and harmful error. That said, most Anglicans respect the faith and reverence of the Roman faith, even if we don’t see the mechanics and use of the Eucharist the same way.
Catholic
We Anglicans are catholic. Why? We’re catholic because we believe in the Bible and the Creeds, and because we retain the historic pattern of bishops, priests, and deacons in historic succession. We don’t see the Anglican church as starting during the Reformation. We see it as starting and continuing from the time of the apostles, landing in England when the Pope sent St. Augustine there.
It was reformed in the 16th century, but its origins were earlier. Therefore, we don’t think that a church has to be in communion with the Pope to be catholic. However, many people are only familiar with the word ‘catholic’ in association with ‘Roman Catholic.’ When we say Anglicans are catholic, people think we mean Roman Catholic; we mean orthodox and universal.
I’ve spent a lot of hours trying to help people see that a church can be catholic without being Roman. At least we think it can. The Roman Catholics don’t see it that way. They sincerely believe that Jesus appointed the Bishop of Rome, the Pope, as the one person to whom every Church should be connected. And since they define catholic that way, they don’t see us Anglicans as catholic. The funny thing is, by our definition, we accept that they are a catholic church. We aren’t willing to drop the word catholic just because other reformational churches are afraid of the word. We retain it because it is ancient and important, even at the risk of seeming to agree with the Roman Catholics on the full definition of the word.
“Antichrist and Whore of Babylon”
No, the Roman Catholic Church is not the biblical “Whore of Babylon” and the Pope is not the Antichrist. This is a mistaken belief. Folks, our Roman Catholic friends believe that Jesus died on the cross for the sins of the world. They believe that he is Lord. They believe in the Holy Trinity. I don’t think this needs much more explanation than that.
Big Picture
The big picture is that Anglicans tend to be friendlier to the Roman Catholics, to see them as fellow Christians, and to respect the Roman Catholic Church as the most visible, leading church in the world, especially in the West. We tend to be okay with the fact that we don’t have to agree with them on every point to accept them as fellow Christians. And we reject the idea that a church isn’t fully catholic unless it is recognized as such by the Pope. We also see the Roman Catholics as important partners in standing together as a witness to Christ in the world, and as leaders in formulating thoughtful theology and platforms for engagement on social issues.
Of course, there are Anglicans who would see things very differently from what I’ve described here. I’m sharing my own experience, and what I see around me most of the time. There are Anglicans who think it’s important for us to differentiate from the Roman Catholics at most points, and they won’t like what I’ve written here. However, my experience is that most Anglicans respect the Roman Catholics, even though we don’t always agree with them.
Image: Photo of St. Peter’s Basilica, Vatican City, by sfabisuk from Getty Images Pro, courtesy of Canva. Digitally edited by Jacob Davis.
Published on
Review Roundup: Deep Anglicanism
While not without criticism, our reviewers found McDermott’s volume to be both accessible and deep. It brings the richness of Anglicanism’s deep history, including its ancient pre-Reformation roots, to bear on our beliefs and practices.
Review: Re-Formed Catholic Anglicanism
This book is a much-needed compilation of thoughtful engagement with the Anglican tradition—from the broadest foundational theological questions to the particulars of its history.
