What do Anglicans Believe about Holy Baptism?

All Christians, not just Anglicans, should trust their baptism. If they believe that Baptism is something God does in and for us, not something we do. And that is exactly how the early Church and the Reformers saw this sacrament!

God brings people to the water of baptism. He sends his Holy Spirit into their lives through the waters of baptism. Christ is the one who baptizes. The recipients should receive baptism as from Christ himself. The one who baptizes is baptizing in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit rather than in his name.

Sponsored

This “baptismal formula” which invokes the name of the Holy Trinity was given to the Apostles by Christ and makes it very clear from the beginning of the Church that baptism is no mere ceremony. God is working in his people to add a new member to Christ’s Body.

Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.

Matthew 28.19-20

Article 27 (XXVII) in the Thirty-Nine Articles

Anglicans attempt to hold on to the teachings of the early Church and the Reformers in their views on Holy Baptism. Article 27 (XXVII) explains it this way; I’ve altered the formatting with a bulleted list.

Baptism is not only a sign of profession, and mark of difference, whereby Christian men are discerned from others that be not christened, but it is also a sign of Regeneration or New-Birth, whereby, as by an instrument,

  • they that receive Baptism rightly are grafted into the Church;
  • the promises of the forgiveness of sin, and of our adoption to be the sons of God by the Holy Ghost, are visibly signed and sealed,
  • Faith is confirmed,
  • and Grace increased by virtue of prayer unto God.

The Baptism of young Children is in any wise to be retained in the Church, as most agreeable with the institution of Christ.

Baptism is, in the Church, accepted as the initiation into the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. It is the actual instrument (or means) God uses to bring people into the Body of Christ.

Biblical Support

Paul writes this in his letter to the Colossians:

having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.

Colossians 2.12

Paul explained to the Romans that baptism is how we are buried with Christ,

We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.

Romans 6.4

Jesus says we enter the Kingdom of Heaven “through water and the spirit” in John 3:5.

St Peter expands on this, preaching a baptism for the forgiveness of sin, which gives us the gift of the Holy Spirit,

Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. … Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ…

Acts 2.38, 1 Peter 3.2

Because of this, our liturgy of Baptism mentions regeneration, adoption as sons of God, new birth, and the sign and seal of the Holy Spirit. The Church was given baptism as how Christ commanded us to bring in new Christians. Therefore, Anglicans accept a baptized person as a Christian and a member of Christ our Lord Jesus’ Church.

Potential Confusion

This can be confusing in that it sounds as if Anglicans believe that the act of Baptism gives the Church or the priest the power to save people. Anglicans, be this as it may, believe with the rest of the Christian Church that only God saves.

It can seem as if this church believes that the water of baptism is magical salvation water, which if poured, provides a kind of “fire insurance” for salvation in which the baptized now have a claim on God’s grace that he is forced to honor. That’s where the last line in Article XXVII comes into play.

In Baptism, faith is not created; it is confirmed. In baptism, grace is not created, but increased by prayer. This demonstrates that while we, the Church, are to welcome new Christians through baptism, and to treat baptized people as Christians, even to associate regeneration and forgiveness with it, we do so while at the same time leaving the origin or presence of faith and grace in God’s hands. When we baptize, we trust in the mercy and grace of God and his promise of forgiveness of sins.

And he said, ‘The God of our fathers appointed you to know his will, to see the Righteous One and to hear a voice from his mouth; for you will be a witness for him to everyone of what you have seen and heard. And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name.’

Acts 22.14-16

“Born Again” vs. “Conversion”

One way to understand this is to separate being “born again” and receiving the Holy Spirit and the forgiveness of sins from “conversion.” Conversion of heart is a highly personal experience that is real and important. Conversion may be a one-time moment or a lifetime of conversions.

Baptism does not necessarily convert our hearts and minds to Christ. We are called to seek the Holy Spirit. Some evangelicals hear our baptismal rite and think we are suggesting that there is no need for personal conversion because many evangelicals associate the term “born again” with personal conversion.

However, to be as biblical as possible, we believe that it is at baptism that a person is born again. Yet we believe that personal conversion is also a work of God that we are to seek after and find by his grace.

The Theology Behind Baptism

The theology behind baptism supports this nuanced but simple view of baptism. The Anglican view is Reformational in the assertion that the foundation of baptism is the New Covenant that God has established with his people through Christ.

Paul tells us that this is a covenant of grace, a freely given, and unmerited gift of God to man in which God assures us that he has provided for our salvation and will apply that salvation to those who have faith in Christ. He gives the gift of faith, turning hearts toward himself.

To provide an objective, shared, and powerfully significant assurance of this reality, God gives us a sign, which is the water of baptism. Paul tells us that this sign parallels the sign of the Old Covenant with Israel, circumcision (Colossians 2:11-13). Just as the Hebrew baby boys were circumcised, so new Christians are baptized. This theology explains why baptism is effective in bringing about what it signifies, but not by the power or will of the person or community, but rather by the sure grace of God in Christ.

In Baptism, the believer is to trust that God has given Him the sign and seal of the Holy Spirit, has forgiven him, and has assured him of His love. God has stamped his name upon his life. He has marked the believer as his own and publicly confirmed faith. We are bound by our baptism as His servants, people, and friends. We are given this grace; we do not take it upon ourselves.

For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit. … For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave[fn]nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.

1 Corinthians 12.13, Galatians 3.27-29

It offers comfort to God’s people. It serves as a guarantee and concrete assurance that God has shown His love through the new covenant. We should trust in our baptism, believing it is a gift from God, and frequently renew our faith in Him.


Want to Learn More?


Photo by Marek Studzinski on Unsplash

Published on

March 13, 2013

Author

The Anglican Pastor

A classic resource from the founding team of Anglican Compass.

View more from The Anglican Pastor

Comments

Please comment with both clarity and charity!

Subscribe to Comments
Notify of
25 Comments

What of those who have weak faith? Is their baptism valid? I was baptized in 1988, but at the time I was in great turmoil, and was more afraid of God than trusting him. Lately though, I’ve been reading a lot of Lutheran theology, and have found great comfort in the thought that God may have really given me forgiveness and salvation and I can rest in it.

Hey Rob,

Great question. I think you are on to something there. You may have had many motivations, but God was the one that claimed you, and cleansed you that day. You can re-affirm your baptism now, confessing your faith and rest in the knowledge that God foreknew and went before you. Like the man who said to Jesus, “I believe, but help me with my unbelief!” Blessings to you.

Thank you for your reply!

Even in lacking understanding or being unsure about receiving baptism, efficacy isn’t hindered? I feel like I’m in the same boat as Rob lol.
I’m glad i did but I’ve felt a bit of guilt about it because I’m not sure if my “faith” or “belief” was genuine at the time of my baptism. I was 12 and i believed in God and Jesus Christ, but I really came to faith in Jesus at 19 or 20. Later on, coming to the Anglican tradition, I feel like I’ve developed serious train of thought on the sacraments too.
All of this has been consuming me on and off lately lol. Have I been wrong in partaking of the holy communion and being confirmed having this over me on and off?
What does the line in Article XXVII mean by “receiving baptism rightly?”

Hey Zach. Yes God brought you there for a reason. He brought you to your baptism and then later to your conversion. And so both are valid and important, regardless of your awareness of that at he time. But you might want to publicly renew your baptism vows. This is a way to reaffirm your baptism now that you realize how important it was. Blessings to you

Should we have only two sacraments, baptism and communion? Confusing! And only one baptism for the remission of sins through grace?

I like this response because some might say or suggest to get “rebaptized,” as if to make a public proclamation of faith. But, if one has been baptized as an infant and later declares his/her faith, that baptism is efficacious, and, therefore, renewing one’s baptismal vows is a great way of affirming faith into the covenant of grace.

Thank you, Rev. Greg, I appreciate your response. Another question raises, quite recently. I remember my baptism, otherwise vividly, but I can’t remember if the trinitarian form was verbalized prior to being immersed. I was raised Baptist (SBC) and my baptism wasn’t at my home church at the time so I can’t exactly refer to it; and it was administered I’m guessing by a staff member of that church. I already asked if they had my name in their baptismal records when I was going through Confirmation. I am aware that Baptists normally do use the trinitarian formula as written in Matt. 28:18-20 for baptisms and I’m rather confident that mine was. Would you consider it a matter to concern much? I ask because of my reading in to sacramental theology. Better understanding that God’s Word with the elements make the sacraments as such. Thank you.

*If I may, I also wanna say I appreciate the work you put in this blog as well as that of others involved. “Anglican Pastor” has been a great learning tool for me in the Anglican tradition and the Christian faith at large. God bless.

Thank you Zach. Love it that this site has been of help!

I think that since Baptists baptize in the Trinity, the intention was there surely and you can rest assured that you were truly baptized. However if your conscience is bothered you could ask for what is called a “conditional” baptism. This is where the priest says “if you were not already baptized, I baptize you in the name of…” But again, the church you were baptized in and the fact that you don’t remember anyone expressly teaching against Trinitarian baptism there is assuring. I hope that helps!

I’m Ann and would like to have a clarification. I was baptized in a different church while I was a 3 year old child.I accepted Jesus Christ this year can. I be baptized again as an adult after moving from my former church to Anglican.

Hello Ann. No need to be baptized again. God knew what he was doing when you were 3 and he led your church to baptize you. He knew you would come to the place where you are now! But many people will chose to renew their baptismal covenant, as an adult. This usually takes place when people are being baptized at a church. You would join them, and you would re-affirm your faith with them. We rejoice with you at your faith in Jesus! Blessings to you.

I’m am struggling to understand the Anglican view of Baptism. I am 18 and attempting to discern whether or not to join the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church or the United Episcopal Church of North America. The reformed view that Baptism represents a “sign and seal of the convent of grace” which admits the participant into the professing church seems to make sense in relation to justification by faith alone. Regeneration is not tied with the act of Baptism, but rather Baptism represents the sign of past, present, or future regeneration. Does the Anglican Church hold to to the view that everyone who is baptized is regenerated? Secondly, if Baptism in the Anglican view is a confirmation of someone’s faith does this imply that Anglican believe infants can have faith? Thirdly, do Anglicans believe that Baptism is only effectual in bringing about regeneration for the elect or does it also regenerate the reprobate? Fourthly, do Anglicans believe that the reprobate can ever have true faith? Sorry if I have misunderstood either position, I am still working through this complex issue.

Easton, those are really great questions. I would refer you to the book It Takes a Church to Baptize by Scott McKnight. I hope that helps! God bless you

I loved this article. It seems to me that the Anglican position is almost a hybrid between the Lutheran and Reformed positions. Yes, God shows us his real love and forgiveness in baptism. And, yes baptism is also a sign and seal of the Covenant of Grace. The Anglican view of baptism is Reformational to the core and truly represents the best of both worlds– as only the reformed-catholic tradition can!

So confusing Purgatory? What about the criminal on the cross next to Jesus ?

Can you clarify this statement: “we believe that it is at baptism that a person is born again.”

Does the Anglican church believe in baptismal regeneration?

There is a slight difference between baptismal regeneration and spiritual regeneration, both of which are within the realm of Anglicanism. Baptismal regeneration is the promise of the Holy Spirit by covenant. We know the Holy Spirit can manifest outside of Baptism (Acts 10:4, 44, 47), but in such cases, the Holy Spirit is not claimed. Baptismal regeneration is the covenant which assures the pardon of sins, adoption into the Church, and aid from the Holy Spirit. Spiritual Regeneration or “born again” is a remission of original sin (infants and adults alike), the gift of the Holy Spirit, and rebirth (hence, “born again”) into the life of the Church. If you are truly interested in learning more, there is a wonderful book authored by the Lord Bishop of Winchester, Edward Harold Browne, An Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion: Historical and Doctrinal. Peace.

Hello.
I was Christened as a baby. We slept attended Church and Sunday School. Attended C of E school and I have faith. However I was never Confirmed. I attended classes but suffered with Asthma so never made it to be confirmed.
Many things have changed, life and living abroad got in the way of attending Mass.
I would now like to ask can I attend Mass, be blessed and take the Body of Christ in your Church or do I still need to be confirmed? Don’t tell anyone I am 66 this year and would like to be a part of your Congregation after hopping around different Churches i(ncluding yours) over the years, .it would be like coming home. Anne

Hi, Anne! Thank you for commenting!

Whether or not a person can receive Holy Communion without being confirmed varies from diocese to diocese. I would suggest speaking with the bishop/priest of your local diocese/parish about this. He would be happy to discuss this, as well as the possibility of being confirmed.

Blessings to you!

I think that despite the differences, different Christian groups know one thing for certain, that without a question, baptism is a significant event in the life of a Christian. Many years ago, I was baptized at https://lhhouston.church/ministries/baptism/. It was an enlightening experience, and God’s goodness and the spirit lifted my spirits!

Pete,

Thank you for the comment! We should be aware of our differences, but you are right in that we should recognize our commonalities as well. One thing we can all agree on is that baptism is required if only because Jesus commanded it.

Blessings to you!

I know this is an old post and that it might not be monitored for comments, but I thought I’d ask a question anyway. I am currently a Calvinist Baptist pastor who is on a theological, transformational journey. I find great beauty in Anglicanism. I am pretty settled on the issue of the Lord’s Supper but I am struggling with Baptism. Are there any resources that can help me, prefereably like a Systematic Theology or something like that?

Hi, Brian! I’m glad to hear you are on this journey, and it’s great that you’re asking these questions.

Three books regarding baptism I’ve found helpful:

  1. The Anglican Evangelical Doctrine of Infant Baptism by Stott and Motyer. While the title implies it’s about infant baptism, the authors spend a good bit of time speaking of baptism in general. It’s a quick read, too. You can purchase it by CLICKING HERE.
  2. Browne’s Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles is good too. You can read his exposition of Article 27 HERE and HERE.

  3. The Second Adam and the New Birth by Sadler is great too. You can purchase it HERE.

That should give you a start!

Read John Jewel’s Treatise on the Sacraments. It’s basically a reflection on Augustine’s “visible and invisible grace” theology. It really clicked for me at that point.

Adam Hunter and Douglas Bodde

I wanted to thank you both. I read both of your recommendations, and they were immensely helpful. I think I finally get it now!